Sterotyping & Prejudice

Working Definitions
nStereotype
nA belief about the personal attributes of a group of people.
nPrejudice
nAn unjustifiable attitude toward a group and its individual members
nDiscrimination
nUnjustifiable behaviour toward a group or its members
n
Categorisation and Distortion are the Foundations of Stereotyping

Why do we categorise?

nItās natural; even infants do it
nIt is generally adaptive and helpful
nIt gives us a sense of control over our environment
Gestalt Categorisation Principles
nAccording to Gestalt Principles, what do we group?
nThings that look similar
nThings that share a common boundary
nThings that are in close proximity
nWe assume that things we group together share more in common with each other than they do with other things that arenāt in that group.
Examples of Grouping
|||| |||| |||| |||| |||| proximity
xxxoooxxxoooxxxoooxxxooo similarity
common boundary
How Does this Apply to Grouping People?
nWe group people who:
nlook like each other
nć10-ft (3-m) ruleä: We group according to things that look similar from a distance: race, sex, height, weight, age
nshare common boundaries
nlive in same block, area
nhave markers that designate common boundaries, like insignias of clubs and organisations
nwho are in close proximity
nthose who are seen together, standing together, etc.
Distortion Maintains Our Belief in Inaccurate Stereotypes
nWhy do we distort?
nIt preserves our sense of self and makes us feel abour about ourselves
nIt prevents us from becoming depressed
nIt provides us with perseverance in difficult tasks and situations
Gestalt Principles of Distortion
nGood form
nthings that are complete (i.e., need for closure)
nExpectation or set
nwe see what we expect to see (i.e., next slides)
nFigure-ground
nwe attribute causality to that which is ćfigureä (i.e., actor-observer biases)
nAssimilation-contrast
nInitially, we perceive things relatively according to contrast, then absolutely (i.e., Person A seen as relatively rich initially, will be seen as absolutely rich thereafter)
Expectation Distortion: Example 1
A
BIRD
IN THE
THE HAND
Expectations Distort Perception
A
BIRD
IN THE
THE HAND
Expectations: Example 2
Count the Fs:
FINISHED FILES ARE THE RE-
SULTS OF YEARS OF SCIENTIF-
IC STUDY COMBINED WITH THE
EXPERIENCE OF YEARS
Auditory Expectations Distort Visual Perception!
Count the Fs:
FINISHED FILES ARE THE RE-
SULTS OF YEARS OF SCIENTIF-
IC STUDY COMBINED WITH THE
EXPERIENCE OF YEARS
A Related Principle from Developmental Psychology
nPiagetian Principle of Assimilation-Accommodation
nAccommodation: changing oneās notion of the world to fit new instances of reality
nAssimilation: changing oneās perception of new instances of reality to fit oneās preconceived notions of what the world is or should be
Stereotyping lays the Foundation for Prejudice
nPrejudice is simply Īpre judging:ā having beliefs and attitudes about a group and assuming individuals in that group are like the prototype. Can be positively or negatively valenced.
nPrejudice is based upon categorisations and distortions that we naturally engage in; not a sign of evil.
nWe all possess the knowledge that fuels prejudice; in order to prevent acting on that knowledge, we must actively inhibit it.
The Power of Prejudice:
Other & Self-fulfilling Prophecies
nSnyder, Tanke, & Berscheid; Snyder & Swann
nWhat we expect of others (based upon stereotypes) influences our perceptions of how these people act
nThese perceptions actually change the behaviour of the target to validate the expectations
How Self-Fulfilling Prophecy Works
nConfirmation Bias
1 5 7 11 13 17 19·??
n We seek to confirm, not disconfirm, our expectations
nSelective Attention
nSelective Recall
nConstriction of Behavioural Options
An Overarching Framework:
The Totalitarian Ego
nGreenwald, 1980, American Psychologist
nThree assumptions of ego (self):
nit is an organisation of knowledge
nis characterised by cognitive biases analogous to totalitarian information-control strategies
nthese biases function to preserve organisation in cognitive structures
Three Ego Biases
nEgocentricity
nEgo as self-focused historian (i.e., we best remember information that is self-relevant and we endeavor to maintain our sense of self. Can be done by maintaining consistency in our beliefs and attitudes toward outgroup members)
nBeneffectance
nPerception of responsibility for desired, but not undesired outcomes (i.e., self-serving biases)
nCognitive Conservatism
nResistance to cognitive change (i.e., we donāt want to change our attitudes, stereotypes, etc.; we change the data to fit our pre-existing beliefs; if we do change, we donāt think we did).
The Concept of ćModern Racismä
Examples:
Old Fashioned Racism
nHow much would you dislike it if an Aboriginal family with about the same income and education as you moved next door
Modern Racism
nOver the past few years, Aboriginal people have gotten more economically than they deserve
Implicit Attitudes Emerge When Cognitively Busy or Stressed
nDevine et al (1989, 1995)
nThose low and high in prejudice are aware of the same stereotypes and often have similar automatic reactions.
nThey differ because the low-prejudice person consciously tries to suppress prejudicial thoughts and feelings.
Summary
nStereotypes and prejudices are natural bi-products of cognition and motivation.
nOnce formed, they are maintained through principles of grouping and distortion.
nThey function to serve the self: ćtotalitarian ego.ä
nPrejudice can be shown even in people who are explicitly not prejudiced.