Venue
Program and Schedule
Organizers
Important Dates and Announcements
Welcome

Back to Schedule

Martin Plávala

Universität Siegen, Germany, martin.plavala@uni-siegen.de

Contextuality as a precondition for entanglement

(joint work with Otfried Gühne)

contextuality vs causality

Quantum theory features several phenomena which can be considered as resources for information processing tasks. Some of these effects, such as entanglement, arise in a non-local scenario, where a quantum state is distributed between different parties. Other phenomena, such as contextuality, can be observed if quantum states are prepared and then subsequently measured. There is a clear distinction between non-local and sequential scenarios: Contextuality experiments have an explicit causal structure since preparations precede measurements, while in the case of entanglement the measurement events can be spacelike separated. Here we provide an intimate connection between different resources by proving that entanglement in a non-local scenario can only arise if there is preparation & measurement contextuality in a sequential scenario derived from the non-local one by remote state preparation. Moreover, the robust absence of entanglement implies the absence of contextuality. As a direct consequence, our result allows to translate any inequality for testing preparation & measurement contextuality into an entanglement test. In addition, entanglement witnesses can be used to obtain novel noncontextuality inequalities which can be violated in the corresponding non-local experiment without any causal structure.

Entanglement-Contextuality
Figure 1: In the non-local scenario, one considers probability distributions of the type p(a, b|ρAB ) = Tr[(Ma ⊗ Nb )ρAB ], where Ma and Nb describe measurements. In the sequential scenario, quantum state σ is prepared and measured, leading to the probabilities p(a|σ) = Tr(σMa ). We show that entanglement in the non-local scenario is practically equivalent to noncontextuality in the sequential scenario, if the state σ ∼ TrB [(1A ⊗Nb )ρAB ] is prepared remotely by performing a measurement on Bob’s part of the bipartite state.